The IRRS review is not an inspection to determine compliance. It is an objective comparison of national regulation against international guidelines and standards. It makes findings that Member States act upon with the aim of enhancing regulatory effectiveness, nuclear and radiological safety. It also identifies good practices, which can be shared internationally.
The UK is a strong supporter of the IRRS and invited its first mission in 2006. This focused particularly on ONR’s preparations for regulating new reactor build. IRRS missions to the UK were also conducted in 2009 and 2013 to review new areas and to follow-up on findings from previous missions.
The IRRS uses a modular approach and most of the modules were reviewed over the course of the first three missions. Then, in 2014, an ‘Expert Mission’ visited ONR to review progress made in addressing the open findings from the previous IRRS missions.
To meet its international obligations to periodically undertake peer reviews, the UK Government formally invited the IAEA to conduct a full-scope IRRS mission in October 2019.
The mission was hosted at ONR’s offices in Bootle. For the first time, it included all regulatory bodies from the UK involved in regulating dutyholders working with ionising radiations. It also involved relevant government departments who have responsibility for policy and who sponsor the regulatory bodies.
Outcomes
The outcome of the peer review is published in the 2019 UK IRRS Mission Report.
In summary, for ONR, the peer review identified:
- 1 Good Practice
- 7 Recommendations
- 5 Suggestions
The IRRS team comprised of 18 experts from around the world. The peer review was held over a two-week period. It involved interviews with representatives from the regulatory bodies and government departments. The IRRS team accompanied inspectors on site visits to a nuclear power plant, a hospital and a carrier transporting radioactive materials.
These recommendations and suggestions are being considered and work is ongoing to address them. The UK intends to invite the IAEA to conduct a follow-up mission within five years. A smaller team of IAEA experts will review the progress that has been made in addressing the findings and aligning with international good practice.
